The moral dimensions of telling the truth or lying may thus be partly determined by whether this motive of self-interest is in harmony with the interests of others lying as an act of self-interest may in some cases be morally justifiable if it is in harmony with the interests of others.
Arguments for the duty to help others disregard the disposition of the giver and, therefore, fail to consider what is morally relevant about the action in other words, a just action is one that comes from a benevolent character, not merely one that produces good consequences.
Are we ever morally justified in breaking the law is anyone ever morally justified in breaking the law in my own opinion i believe the answer to this question is no human nature consists of three basic components these are to live, breed, and to dominate.
Furthermore, while the bible never condones lying qua lying (lying for the sake of lying), it does condone lying in order to preserve a higher moral imperative for example, rahab purposed to deceive (the lesser moral law) in order to preserve the lives of two jewish spies (the higher moral law. In a moral stance, since an adult has a right to life and not a fetus, my mother, technically if ever placed in a situation for choosing between my mother and a fetus, deserves to live not the fetus in addition, a “fetus” is the zygote formed upon conception.
Is lying ever morally permissible while lying can be seen as a threat to civil society, there seem to be several instances in which lying seems the most intuitively moral option besides, if a sufficiently broad definition of lying is adopted, it seems utterly impossible to escape lies, either because of instances of self-deception or because of the social construction of our persona. There many things that could be argued are morally wrong but legally the first that comes to mind in the production of animals for slaughter, it is estimated that 59 billion animals are killed each year world wide for food.